Add to My Yahoo! | Google Reader or Homepage | Add to Windows Live | Add to Windows Live Alerts

Wictor Wilén

Microsoft Certified Master (MCM) - SharePoint 2010 | Microsoft Most Valuable Professional (MVP) - SharePoint Server MVP | Author

Once SharePoint, Always SharePoint - what's wrong with that?

Posted at 2009-02-10 02:35 by Wictor Wilén in SharePoint with 4 comments.

Computer Sweden has an article in today's issue, also published online yesterday, called “Impossible to get rid of the cash cow of Microsoft”. To sum it up briefly it discusses how hard it is to get rid of Microsoft SharePoint once you have it installed in your environment and that the licensing costs flies away. An interviewed CTO states that companies he met don’t have control of their SharePoint installations and that they had to step back and look at the ownership and licenses.

The article has some substance, but is is only viewed from one point.

First of all one thing I agree with and that I have experience of - SharePoint installation madness. SharePoint is a complicated product/application/platform and should not be installed or launched if you do not have time or experience of it, period. You should have someone to help you out with these projects so that you have control of your installation, storage, security, governance etc etc. Planning - this is the most basic rule of any SharePoint installation.

Second to think of is the article byline: “Once SharePoint, always SharePoint”. This is in the article read with a negative emphasis. If you invest and plan a SharePoint installation you should of course look into the future, but that future is probably not measured in months it’s most probably the platform you company will use over a foreseeable future. Once again the keyword here is Planning, and this has nothing to do with the platform. Every platform of this magnitude; WebSphere, Alfresco, DotNetNuke whatever you choose requires that you plan your installation and maintenance.

If you one day discover that you need to change platform, this will cost and take time, independent of your choice of platform. Just make sure that it’s well documented and supports standards. SharePoint currently supports several standards, it will support the new CMIS (Content Management Interoperability Services) and thanks to Microsoft's new openness it’s quite well documented.

Pricing and licensing is always a tough area to discuss. Yes, using SharePoint will cost you in server licenses and CALs but it’s not more expensive than comparable competitors. If you want to publish a web site and use all the powerful enterprise features of SharePoint you can’t expect the licenses to be the same as for a simple CMS system, in that case you choose the wrong platform to start with - Planning.

I truly believe that if you invest in SharePoint you will definitely have a platform that you will use for a long time and not wanting to phase out.

Comments and trackbacks

#  Way to go WW by Andreas Kviby
Screenshot from websnpr Really good WW! SharePoint rocks!
#  WSS 3.0 forgotten by Mike Walsh
Screenshot from websnpr It seems to me that far too many companies (encouraged by their local Microsoft offices?) go to MOSS without ever considering the alternative of using WSS 3.0. These will then often be the same companies that start wondering why they are paying so much for the functions they are using. The reason is naturally that they are paying for the wide range of functionality included in the MOSS "package" but using only the basic functions that they could equally (and much much cheaper) get by installing WSS 3.0. I see WSS 3.0 as the perfect entry product. You get immediate benefits and yet if you ever want more, the upgrade to either MOSS version is still available to you without any loss of data. You'll also, because of existing SharePoint experience, be better able to judge the benefits that MOSS will give you and whether they are worth paying for.
#  Re: WSS 3.0 forgotten by Wictor
Screenshot from websnpr I fully agree with you Mike. I've done a lot of WSS jobs, and most of our customers start with WSS. Once they understand the value of the product, the licensing costs is not that big issue (except when it comes to creating publishing sites for the internet).
#  Tampa carpet cleaning by Tampa carpet cleaning
Screenshot from websnpr Hi, I have read your post. Keep it save to my bookmarks. Nice post and thanks for share.
Make a comment on this post:
Subject:  

Your name:  
Your Url:  
Note: submissions may have to be approved before being visible, so don't submit your comment multiple times.